Super Takumar 2.8 / 105 and Auto Takumar 2.8 / 105. Yes, contrary to usual, in this review I will simultaneously test and review two photographic lenses. They have the same focal length and the same aperture ratio. But here's a drawing ...
In general, to the point.
But if I was asked - which of these Takurmars would you choose? - I would honestly answer: "None!" Well, I don’t like them, or something ... I had a fifty kopeck 1.4, which I gave back without regret. These hundred square meters did not impress me either. Although it should be noted that the nature of the company can be traced in all glasses. The general tonality of the Takumar drawing tends to be somewhat "smoky", "mythical", and hidden. It's like a “lens in itself”, which transforms reality into something as if looking at us from the past ... Hence this feeling of heaviness, unhurriedness, withdrawal into oneself.
Do you know what I would shoot Takumaram? Probably something like a lonely flower against the background of a burning hut after the raid of nomads ...
I would like to express my gratitude for the provided lens to Andrey Spirin.
- Author: Krasnoyarsk photographer Artur Mikhanev
- Photographer, consultant, teacher
write me. Help the project: 5469 1200 1062 4624. Comments can be left without registration and SMS